Talk:Gravitation demystified
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MM87 (talk | contribs) at 19:40, August 9, 2011. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Hi JimJast, I think you would be better to rename this to "Essay:Gravitation demystified". Ask an administrator if they would do that for you. Maratrean 20:50, 15 July 2011 (EDT)
- Hi Maratrean, how do I ask administrator about anything in general and the thing above in particular? JimJast 11:49, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- I also noticed that CP is much better than WP in gravitation though for some reason they didn't notice neither Einsteinian mechanism nor its quantum properties coming from this Einsteinian mechanism. JimJast 18:12, 2 August 2011 (EDT)
- Hi JimJast, there is a reason why the mechanism you illustrated is not cited in WP. The reason is that you have only written a tautology:
in (4) you used F=ma, which is eq. (5), to obtain (5) (by the way, F=ma is incompatibile with E=mc²). --MM87 15:40, 9 August 2011 (EDT)