Talk:Conservative Dictionary Project (M)

"liberals want to define marriage as anything they want"

Please show me where there is a credible movement with the support of the liberal political/intellectual establishment that is campaigning to legalize marriage involving children or animals. If you do not provide a credible reference, I will revert the edit in 24 hours. Thanks. BrentH 15:18, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

This is a dictionary project, it doesn't rely on references, it relies on the realities of the true meaning of words and the liberal agenda. Liberals want to redefine marriage anyway they want, they are very good at hiding their real agenda, but many conservative politicians have picked up on it. Liberals like NAMBLA promote marriage between adults and children, Muslims want polygamy, homosexuals want gay marriage and some liberal Furrys want marriage between animal and man. Open your eyes. --CraigF 15:45, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Perhaps you're unfamiliar with the way a dictionary works, but they very much do rely on references, namely by giving documented evidence of words being used in a particular manner. BrentH 15:51, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Perhaps you should argue against the facts that I have presented rather than using straw men. Don't deny the truth, liberals want to redefine marriage anyway they want. I don't know what you mean by "parody," this isn't supposed to be funny. How can you be "over the top" if you are presenting facts? --CraigF 16:07, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Can you show me a credible liberal campaign to allow "man to marry beast?" BrentH 16:13, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Also, as this is a dictionary project we should try to keep our definitions straight. Furries are people who like to dress up as anthropomorphic animals and engage in sex, it has nothing to do with bestiality.

And for the record, you'd be hard pressed to find someone in the gay community who supports NAMBLA. Gays dislike pedophiles as much as the rest of the world. --JonnS 16:19, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Gays and Nambla are different, but they are both liberals who defy God's law. Many Furrys engage in bestiality, look it up. --CraigF 16:38, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Craig, you're very good at making sweeping statements with no supporting documentation whatsoever. BrentH 16:44, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Tried finding anything about furrys engaging in bestiality but there was nothing credible on the first couple of pages of a google search, which leads me to believe that bestiality is not an important component of furrys--JonnS 16:50, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

John you are a liberal, you obviously don't read the bible and you are obviously supporting the liberal agenda. Furries engage in both simulated and real bestiality. I can't believe I'm arguing this with you. You are arguing that depraved people aren't depraved. --CraigF 19:00, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Do you have any documented evidence that 1. this kind of behavior is widespread enough so as to be noteworthy, and 2, that it translates into a viable political move to allow for man-animal marriages? BrentH 19:13, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

Yes, I would like to see evidence as well... Also, my liberal bias is well documented on my user page, check it out.

Also, I would like to know what your stance on Animal Husbandry is?--JonnS 20:42, 6 September 2011 (EDT)

The point is liberals want to redefine marriage to mean anything they want. I refuse to answer liberal JohnS's mocking and ridiculous questions. I assume he will be blocked shortly for trying to insert liberal propaganda into this dictionary project. --CraigF 13:19, 7 September 2011 (EDT)

"The point is liberals want to redefine marriage to mean anything they want." Do you have evidence that "liberal" activists/politicians/intellectuals/opinion-makers are trying to "redefine" marriage to include children or animals? BrentH 14:21, 7 September 2011 (EDT)

Craig, I really would like to know what your stance on animal husbandry is. Also, it's Jonn, not John, please don't misspell my name...