Template talk:Evident
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CPalmer (talk | contribs) at 08:15, April 18, 2012. It may differ significantly from current revision.
obvious and/or undisputed
The very use of this template at E=mc² shows how bad the idea is[1] .
- I don't agree. The template hasn't changed anything about that page or its content, except that new users will now be swiftly directed to the relevant page that tells them why a reference is not required. It will be particularly useful to those with some knowledge of Wikipedia, who may assume that Conservapedia works in the same way.
- In the future, I anticipate that this template will also act as a good, robust response to those who seek to undermine good material through excessive use of the {{fact}} template, as has happened here in the past.
However, if you'd like to suggest better wording than "obvious and/or undisputed" then please do. I think we could probably improve on that.--CPalmer 04:15, 18 April 2012 (EDT)