Difference between revisions of "Build Back Better"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Build Back Better''' is the slogan of the one world [[World Economic Forum]] as outlined in the [[Great Reset]] to destroy individual freedom and strengthen the control of [[corrupt]] global elites in the aftermath of the [[CCP pandemic]].<ref>https://youtu.be/YkcaeaD45MY</ref>
+
'''Build Back Better''' is the slogan of the one world [[World Economic Forum]] as outlined in the [[Great Reset]] to destroy individual freedom and strengthen the control of [[corrupt]] global elites in the aftermath of the [[CCP pandemic]].<ref>https://youtu.be/YkcaeaD45MY</ref> In the [[United States]], socialist leader [[Joe Biden]] made Build Back Better the centerpiece of $3.5 trillion proposal to destroy American [[capitalism]].  Sen. [[Jo Manchin]] described the effects of Build Back Better:
 +
{{quotebox-float|Every Member of Congress has a solemn duty to vote for what they believe is best for the country and the American people, not their party. Respectfully, as I have said for months, I can’t support $3.5 trillion more in spending when we have already spent $5.4 trillion since last March. At some point, all of us, regardless of party must ask the simple question – how much is enough?
 +
 
 +
What I have made clear to the President and Democratic leaders is that spending trillions more on new and expanded government programs, when we can’t even pay for the essential social programs, like [[Social Security]] and [[Medicare]], is the definition of fiscal insanity. Suggesting that spending trillions more will not have an impact on [[inflation]] ignores the everyday reality that America’s families continue pay an unavoidable inflation tax. Proposing a historic expansion of social programs while ignoring the fact we are not in a [[recession]] and that millions of jobs remain open will only feed a dysfunction that could weaken our economic recovery. ....Our tax code should ...not weaken our global competitiveness or the ability of millions of small businesses to compete with the [[Amazon.com|Amazons]] of the world. Overall, the amount we spend now must be balanced with what we need and can afford – not designed to reengineer the social and economic fabric of this nation or vengefully tax for the sake of wishful spending....I have made it clear ...the need to means test any new social programs so that we are helping those who need it the most, not spend for the sake of spending....America is a great nation but great nations throughout history have been weakened by careless spending and bad policies. Now, more than ever, we must work together to avoid these fatal mistakes so that we may fulfill our greatest responsibility as elected leaders and pass on a better America to the next generation.<ref>https://noqreport.com/2021/09/29/heres-what-joe-manchins-statement-against-3-5t-build-back-better-plan-really-means/</ref>}}
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 10:30, October 2, 2021

Build Back Better is the slogan of the one world World Economic Forum as outlined in the Great Reset to destroy individual freedom and strengthen the control of corrupt global elites in the aftermath of the CCP pandemic.[1] In the United States, socialist leader Joe Biden made Build Back Better the centerpiece of $3.5 trillion proposal to destroy American capitalism. Sen. Jo Manchin described the effects of Build Back Better:

Every Member of Congress has a solemn duty to vote for what they believe is best for the country and the American people, not their party. Respectfully, as I have said for months, I can’t support $3.5 trillion more in spending when we have already spent $5.4 trillion since last March. At some point, all of us, regardless of party must ask the simple question – how much is enough?

What I have made clear to the President and Democratic leaders is that spending trillions more on new and expanded government programs, when we can’t even pay for the essential social programs, like Social Security and Medicare, is the definition of fiscal insanity. Suggesting that spending trillions more will not have an impact on inflation ignores the everyday reality that America’s families continue pay an unavoidable inflation tax. Proposing a historic expansion of social programs while ignoring the fact we are not in a recession and that millions of jobs remain open will only feed a dysfunction that could weaken our economic recovery. ....Our tax code should ...not weaken our global competitiveness or the ability of millions of small businesses to compete with the Amazons of the world. Overall, the amount we spend now must be balanced with what we need and can afford – not designed to reengineer the social and economic fabric of this nation or vengefully tax for the sake of wishful spending....I have made it clear ...the need to means test any new social programs so that we are helping those who need it the most, not spend for the sake of spending....America is a great nation but great nations throughout history have been weakened by careless spending and bad policies. Now, more than ever, we must work together to avoid these fatal mistakes so that we may fulfill our greatest responsibility as elected leaders and pass on a better America to the next generation.[2]

References