Difference between revisions of "Celebrity"
From Conservapedia
(Undo revision 462278 by Special:Contributions/JustinB (User talk:JustinB)) |
MikeSalter (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A '''celebrity''' is a widely known individual. [[Actor]]s, and [[musician|musical artists]] are often considered celebrities. While some celebrities are famous for discoveries or works that benefit humanity, | + | A '''celebrity''' is a widely known individual. [[Actor]]s, and [[musician|musical artists]] are often considered celebrities. While some celebrities are famous for discoveries or works that benefit humanity, increasingly the [[Liberal]] [[media]] are promoting and extolling 'celebrities' who have no real achievements to their credit: [[reality tv]] 'stars', relatives of the rich and famous, and those who are 'famous for being famous'. Great amounts of attention are paid to the immodesty, the drug-taking habits and the promiscuous relationships of such 'celebrities', without any moral disapproval of such behavious being voiced. |
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
[[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession]] | [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession]] | ||
| + | [[Hollywood values]] | ||
[[Category:Sociology]] | [[Category:Sociology]] | ||
Revision as of 17:27, January 18, 2009
A celebrity is a widely known individual. Actors, and musical artists are often considered celebrities. While some celebrities are famous for discoveries or works that benefit humanity, increasingly the Liberal media are promoting and extolling 'celebrities' who have no real achievements to their credit: reality tv 'stars', relatives of the rich and famous, and those who are 'famous for being famous'. Great amounts of attention are paid to the immodesty, the drug-taking habits and the promiscuous relationships of such 'celebrities', without any moral disapproval of such behavious being voiced.
