Difference between revisions of "Creation science"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Creation science''' is an effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. | + | '''Creation science''' is an absurd effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the [[Theory of evolution|theory of evolution]]. There is only one word to deefine how jerk are their members: jerk. |
Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the worldviews of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. Specifically, | Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the worldviews of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. Specifically, | ||
a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] Also, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html] | a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] Also, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html] | ||
Revision as of 15:32, April 24, 2007
Creation science is an absurd effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible—usually with a literal six-day-creation interpretation—and not with the theory of evolution. There is only one word to deefine how jerk are their members: jerk.
Creation science is not accepted by most scientists, but this is claimed to be due partly to the worldviews of the scientists, rather than scientific evidences. Specifically, a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 55% of scientists believed there is a God.[1] Also, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the United States National Academy of Sciences do not believe there is a God. [2]
