Difference between revisions of "Creation science"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(added material)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
  
An effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists.  However, a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.<ref>http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html</ref> In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God.<ref>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html</ref>
+
An effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists.  However, a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html]

Revision as of 23:52, March 25, 2007

Template:Stub

An effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[1] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the United States National Academy of Sciences do not believe there is a God. [2]