Last modified on October 4, 2008, at 01:10

Crespo v. Crespo

This is the current revision of Crespo v. Crespo as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 01:10, October 4, 2008. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Crespo v. Crespo is a decision by a trial court in New Jersey establishing that proof of domestic violence requires clear and convincing evidence by virtue of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[1]

The court applied Mathews v. Eldridge to reject the "preponderance of the evidence" standard previously applied to allegations of domestic violence.

References

  1. http://www.falseallegations.com/crespo-v-crespo-nj-schultz-decision-61908.htm