Difference between revisions of "Martinez v. California"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(wiify)
(Bold, link)
Line 1: Line 1:
In ''Martinez v. California'', 444 U.S. 277, 283-284, n. 7 (1980), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] removed any doubt that state courts may entertain [[Section 1983]] actions.  The Court reserved the question whether state courts are obligated to entertain [[Section 1983]] actions, but held that Congress has not barred them from doing so.
+
In '''''Martinez v. California''''', 444 U.S. 277, 283-284, n. 7 (1980), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] removed any doubt that state courts may entertain [[Section 1983]] actions.  The Court reserved the question whether state courts are obligated to entertain [[Section 1983]] actions, but held that [[Congress]] has not barred them from doing so.
 +
 
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[category:Section 1983]]
 
[[category:Section 1983]]

Revision as of 03:17, January 14, 2008

In Martinez v. California, 444 U.S. 277, 283-284, n. 7 (1980), the U.S. Supreme Court removed any doubt that state courts may entertain Section 1983 actions. The Court reserved the question whether state courts are obligated to entertain Section 1983 actions, but held that Congress has not barred them from doing so.