Difference between revisions of "Mobocracy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Perhaps not popular, but necessary for balance.)
(expanded; made into a separate paragraph; internal link to Morton's fork)
(19 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A mobocracy is rule by a group of people unrestrained by an meaningful principles.  A mobocracy has a tendency to be arbitrary and to engage in bullying towards critics or dissenters.
+
'''Mobocracy''' is a synonym for ''ochlocracy'', the rule by a group of [[people]] unrestrained by any meaningful principles.  A mobocracy has a tendency to be arbitrary and to engage in [[bully]]ing towards critics or dissenters. Wikis and other online communities tend towards mobocracy if strong measures aren't taken to prevent this. Many conservatives feel that [[Wikipedia®]] takes inadequate measures.<ref>Chris Edwards. [http://blog.hackingcough.com/2007/03/on-wikipedia-no.htm On Wikipedia, nobody's sure you're a prof], ''HackingCaugh'', 1 March 2007.</ref> In some cases, democracy can also be demonstrated by mobocracy. Infamous examples of these include the [[French Revolution]], as well as the leftist protestors in Wisconsin and the various leftist rioters such as [[antifa]] during the Donald Trump administration.
  
Examples of a mobocracy include the aftermath of the [[French Revolution]] and, according to their critics, [[Wikipedia]] and [[Conservapedia]].<ref>http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/20601</ref>
+
People tend to be indulgent toward mobocracy when they assume that the mob will necessarily [[original-position fallacy|side with them]]. When they are proved wrong, they often [[Morton's fork|do an about face]] and say that the whims of the mob should not determine morality.
 
+
== References ==
+
  
 +
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
  
[[category:politics]]
+
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 +
[[Category:Forms of Government]]

Revision as of 17:18, June 13, 2018

Mobocracy is a synonym for ochlocracy, the rule by a group of people unrestrained by any meaningful principles. A mobocracy has a tendency to be arbitrary and to engage in bullying towards critics or dissenters. Wikis and other online communities tend towards mobocracy if strong measures aren't taken to prevent this. Many conservatives feel that Wikipedia® takes inadequate measures.[1] In some cases, democracy can also be demonstrated by mobocracy. Infamous examples of these include the French Revolution, as well as the leftist protestors in Wisconsin and the various leftist rioters such as antifa during the Donald Trump administration.

People tend to be indulgent toward mobocracy when they assume that the mob will necessarily side with them. When they are proved wrong, they often do an about face and say that the whims of the mob should not determine morality.

References

  1. Chris Edwards. On Wikipedia, nobody's sure you're a prof, HackingCaugh, 1 March 2007.