Difference between revisions of "Objective morality"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[William Lane Craig]] declared:
 
The [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[William Lane Craig]] declared:
{{cquote|...to say that the Holocaust was objectively evil is to say that it was evil, even though the Nazis who carried it out thought that it was good, and it would still have been evil even if the Nazis had won World War II and succeeded in brainwashing or exterminating everyone who disagreed with them, so that everybody thought the Holocaust was good.”<ref>[http://www.strangenotions.com/does-objective-morality-depend-upon-god/ Does objective morality depend upon God?]</ref>}}
+
{{cquote|...to say that the [[Holocaust]] was objectively [[evil]] is to say that it was evil, even though the Nazis who carried it out thought that it was good, and it would still have been evil even if the Nazis had won World War II and succeeded in brainwashing or exterminating everyone who disagreed with them, so that everybody thought the Holocaust was good.”<ref>[http://www.strangenotions.com/does-objective-morality-depend-upon-god/ Does objective morality depend upon God?]</ref>}}
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
  
 
*[[Moral relativism]]
 
*[[Moral relativism]]
 +
*[[Atheism and the Problem of Evil|Atheism and the problem of evil]]
 +
*[[Problem of evil]]
 +
*[[Theodicy]]
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 15:16, February 3, 2016

The Christian apologist William Lane Craig declared:

...to say that the Holocaust was objectively evil is to say that it was evil, even though the Nazis who carried it out thought that it was good, and it would still have been evil even if the Nazis had won World War II and succeeded in brainwashing or exterminating everyone who disagreed with them, so that everybody thought the Holocaust was good.”[1]

See also

References