Difference between revisions of "Samuel P. Huntington"
(New page: '''Samuel P. Huntington''' is a Harvard professor of political science,<ref>http://www.gov.harvard.edu/faculty/shuntington/</ref> famous for writing the provocative book [[Clas...) |
|||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''Samuel P. Huntington''' | + | '''Samuel P. Huntington''' (1927–2008) was a [[Harvard]] [[professor]] of [[political science]],<ref>http://www.gov.harvard.edu/faculty/shuntington/</ref> famous for writing the provocative book [[Clash of Civilizations|''The Clash of Civilizations the Remaking of the World Order'']],<ref>https://www.amazon.com/Clash-Civilizations-Remaking-World-Order/dp/0684844419</ref> which hypothesized that, in the post-[[Cold War]] era, international conflict would not be defined by ideological competition between [[Marxism]] and [[capitalism]], but rather clashes between [[civilization]]s. To support his argument, Huntington broke the world down into five civilizations and analyzed recent conflicts between the groups. |
| − | Huntington's thesis | + | While first received positively, after the [[9/11 attacks]] Huntington's thesis was widely criticized for his famous quotation, "[[Islam]]'s borders are bloody and so are its innards,"<ref>“Islam's borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for [[the West]] is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power.” https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/38041.Samuel_P_Huntington</ref> implying Islam was at war with much of the rest of the world. The [[George W. Bush]] [[State Department]] immediately repudiated the claim that the [[War on Terror]] was a clash of civilizations, and attempted to limit the conflict by isolating and marginalizing radical Islamic extremists.<ref>"radical Islamic extremists" or "jihadists". A question remained to what extent [[jihad]] was inherent to Islam, or "[[secularization]]" vs. "[[desecularization]]."</ref> |
| − | + | An excerpt from the obituary of Samuel P. Huntington published at ''The Telegraph'': | |
| + | {{Cquote|Huntington identified eight major civilisations in the world: "Western, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American and possibly African civilization." But much of the article examined the scope for conflict between just two of those: the West and Islam. | ||
| − | [[ | + | The West, he suggested was "at its peak" and its "efforts to promote its values of democracy and liberalism as universal values, to maintain its military predominance and to advance its economic interests" would only "engender countering responses from other civilizations". With ethnicity and religion defining identity, wars would not be about "what side you are on" but "what you are". Military confrontations would take on "an 'us' against 'them' relation". |
| + | |||
| + | The clash of civilisations, would, Huntington suggested, be acted out most violently on the boundaries between them. "Conflict along the fault line between Western and Islamic civilizations has been going on for 1,300 years," he noted, predicting that it would become "more virulent". But Islam's problems would not just be with the West. "Violence also occurs between Muslims, on the one hand, and Orthodox Serbs in the Balkans, Jews in Israel, Hindus in India, Buddhists in Burma and Catholics in the Philippines," he wrote. "Islam has bloody borders.""<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20170205101213/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/3999461/Samuel-Huntington.html Samuel P. Huntington - Obituary], ''The Telegragh'', 2008</ref>}} | ||
| + | Huntington is often referred to as a civilizational historian and built upon the work pioneered by [[Oswald Spengler]] and [[Arnold J. Toynbee]]. Despite the criticism Huntington received in the early days of the War on Terror as his work fell out of use in academic circles, two decades after the book first appeared many began to view the work as prophetic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External links == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[https://web.archive.org/web/20170205101213/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/3999461/Samuel-Huntington.html Samuel P. Huntington - Obituary], ''The Telegraph'', December 2008 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{DEFAULTSORT:Huntington, Samuel}} | ||
| + | [[Category:Political Figures]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Academics]] | ||
Revision as of 21:36, May 1, 2021
Samuel P. Huntington (1927–2008) was a Harvard professor of political science,[1] famous for writing the provocative book The Clash of Civilizations the Remaking of the World Order,[2] which hypothesized that, in the post-Cold War era, international conflict would not be defined by ideological competition between Marxism and capitalism, but rather clashes between civilizations. To support his argument, Huntington broke the world down into five civilizations and analyzed recent conflicts between the groups.
While first received positively, after the 9/11 attacks Huntington's thesis was widely criticized for his famous quotation, "Islam's borders are bloody and so are its innards,"[3] implying Islam was at war with much of the rest of the world. The George W. Bush State Department immediately repudiated the claim that the War on Terror was a clash of civilizations, and attempted to limit the conflict by isolating and marginalizing radical Islamic extremists.[4]
An excerpt from the obituary of Samuel P. Huntington published at The Telegraph:
| “ | Huntington identified eight major civilisations in the world: "Western, Confucian, Japanese, Islamic, Hindu, Slavic-Orthodox, Latin American and possibly African civilization." But much of the article examined the scope for conflict between just two of those: the West and Islam.
The West, he suggested was "at its peak" and its "efforts to promote its values of democracy and liberalism as universal values, to maintain its military predominance and to advance its economic interests" would only "engender countering responses from other civilizations". With ethnicity and religion defining identity, wars would not be about "what side you are on" but "what you are". Military confrontations would take on "an 'us' against 'them' relation". The clash of civilisations, would, Huntington suggested, be acted out most violently on the boundaries between them. "Conflict along the fault line between Western and Islamic civilizations has been going on for 1,300 years," he noted, predicting that it would become "more virulent". But Islam's problems would not just be with the West. "Violence also occurs between Muslims, on the one hand, and Orthodox Serbs in the Balkans, Jews in Israel, Hindus in India, Buddhists in Burma and Catholics in the Philippines," he wrote. "Islam has bloody borders.""[5] |
” |
Huntington is often referred to as a civilizational historian and built upon the work pioneered by Oswald Spengler and Arnold J. Toynbee. Despite the criticism Huntington received in the early days of the War on Terror as his work fell out of use in academic circles, two decades after the book first appeared many began to view the work as prophetic.
External links
- Samuel P. Huntington - Obituary, The Telegraph, December 2008
References
- ↑ http://www.gov.harvard.edu/faculty/shuntington/
- ↑ https://www.amazon.com/Clash-Civilizations-Remaking-World-Order/dp/0684844419
- ↑ “Islam's borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power.” https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/38041.Samuel_P_Huntington
- ↑ "radical Islamic extremists" or "jihadists". A question remained to what extent jihad was inherent to Islam, or "secularization" vs. "desecularization."
- ↑ Samuel P. Huntington - Obituary, The Telegragh, 2008
