Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism and deception"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
("Evolutionary Position Gradually Losing Public Support")
(Atheism, Evolution, "Social Darwinism", and Eugenics: new section)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
This page seems almost exclusively to concern evolutionism, not atheism per se.  However strongly correlated, they shouldn't be conflated into a single ideological position.  I realize that to the CP crowd the evils of liberalism, atheism, and evolutionism are interchangeable, but let's at least pretend we care about accuracy. --[[User:Osiris1723|Osiris1723]] 00:47, 21 June 2009
 
This page seems almost exclusively to concern evolutionism, not atheism per se.  However strongly correlated, they shouldn't be conflated into a single ideological position.  I realize that to the CP crowd the evils of liberalism, atheism, and evolutionism are interchangeable, but let's at least pretend we care about accuracy. --[[User:Osiris1723|Osiris1723]] 00:47, 21 June 2009
 
::: Osiris1723, I moved a sentence up for you so now it is the first sentence of the article.  With that being said, if you want to post in the talk page instances of atheists deception in the Eastern world, Conservapedia would certainly consider including it in the article. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 13:23, 24 July 2010 (EDT)
 
::: Osiris1723, I moved a sentence up for you so now it is the first sentence of the article.  With that being said, if you want to post in the talk page instances of atheists deception in the Eastern world, Conservapedia would certainly consider including it in the article. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 13:23, 24 July 2010 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Atheism, Evolution, "Social Darwinism", and Eugenics ==
 +
 +
Perhaps a good addition to this article would be a paragraph on the deception of atheists in regard to the eugenic position, and subsequent mass murder, favoured by Hitler, among others. They frequently decieve with the claim that these murderous acts were not based on Darwin's work, or were based on a misunderstanding. --[[User:LucyB|LucyB]] 17:10, 25 August 2010 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:10, August 25, 2010

"Evolutionary Position Gradually Losing Public Support"

What does this have to do with the argument that evolutionists are deceitful? Moreover, what does public support have to do with the truth value of any idea? How many Americans believe that Elvis is still alive? Or in UFOs? Or Bigfoot? Or that Obama is a Muslim? Are any of these ideas more or less valid because of what the American people think about them? AliceBG 19:54, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

I suggest you read the article several times until the obvious becomes more obvious to you. Conservative 21:06, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
Because reading it is all you can do. You sure ain't going to be editing it. --DenningMR 21:08, 30 June 2008 (EDT)

This page seems almost exclusively to concern evolutionism, not atheism per se. However strongly correlated, they shouldn't be conflated into a single ideological position. I realize that to the CP crowd the evils of liberalism, atheism, and evolutionism are interchangeable, but let's at least pretend we care about accuracy. --Osiris1723 00:47, 21 June 2009

Osiris1723, I moved a sentence up for you so now it is the first sentence of the article. With that being said, if you want to post in the talk page instances of atheists deception in the Eastern world, Conservapedia would certainly consider including it in the article. conservative 13:23, 24 July 2010 (EDT)

Atheism, Evolution, "Social Darwinism", and Eugenics

Perhaps a good addition to this article would be a paragraph on the deception of atheists in regard to the eugenic position, and subsequent mass murder, favoured by Hitler, among others. They frequently decieve with the claim that these murderous acts were not based on Darwin's work, or were based on a misunderstanding. --LucyB 17:10, 25 August 2010 (EDT)