Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corruption"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(universal)
(Please stop wikilawyering. Wait for aschlafly to give his opinion and then respect it, whatever it is.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to [[Liberal corruption]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST)
 
:Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to [[Liberal corruption]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST)
−
::Corruption appears as soon as politicians get power--it's pretty much a fact of life in every country, in every party, in every political era. What's interesting is how it's fought against. Here's where [[republicanism]] enters as a weapon to fight corruption.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:52, 18 January 2010 (EST)
 

Revision as of 21:59, January 18, 2010

Corruption doesn't belong under politics? I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --Gulik5 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to Liberal corruption. --Ed Poor Talk 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST)
Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Corruption&oldid=746149"