Difference between revisions of "Talk:Corruption"
From Conservapedia
(nice edit, Rod, but watch out) |
(universal) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to [[Liberal corruption]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST) | :Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to [[Liberal corruption]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | ::Corruption appears as soon as politicians get power--it's pretty much a fact of life in every country, in every party, in every political era. What's interesting is how it's fought against. Here's where [[republicanism]] enters as a weapon to fight corruption.[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 16:52, 18 January 2010 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:52, January 18, 2010
Corruption doesn't belong under politics? I always thought corruption and politics went together like chicken and waffles. --Gulik5 01:04, 3 April 2008 (EDT)
- Rod, if you overstate the case for liberals being corrupt, I will move this article to Liberal corruption. --Ed Poor Talk 09:37, 18 December 2008 (EST)
- Corruption appears as soon as politicians get power--it's pretty much a fact of life in every country, in every party, in every political era. What's interesting is how it's fought against. Here's where republicanism enters as a weapon to fight corruption.RJJensen 16:52, 18 January 2010 (EST)
