Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Quantifying Mental Strength"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Dog attacks)
(Dog attacks: reply)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:I would argue that not wanting a large dog to chase you or not wanting to get shot are both very rational fears.  I think you're trying to link gun control policies with lacking "mental strength," and I don't think it's a good comparison.  There's a big difference between being afraid of being shot (if you were in a combat zone, wouldn't you be?) and believing that less guns in society as a whole would reduce crime.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 10:45, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
 
:I would argue that not wanting a large dog to chase you or not wanting to get shot are both very rational fears.  I think you're trying to link gun control policies with lacking "mental strength," and I don't think it's a good comparison.  There's a big difference between being afraid of being shot (if you were in a combat zone, wouldn't you be?) and believing that less guns in society as a whole would reduce crime.  [[User:Corry|Corry]] 10:45, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: This obviously refers to an irrational or exaggerated fear of dog attacks, or guns.  There may be legitimate fears of flying in airplanes, but the "fear of flying" obviously refers to an irrational or exaggerated fear.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:33, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:33, October 21, 2008

Thrives

Do you think "excels" might be a better word than "thrives" in the opening line? Corry 11:20, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

How about "is obsessed with"? Human 19:23, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
Maybe "delights?" --ToJones 19:25, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
Physical fitness is a good thing. Mental fitness would be even better. I don't see how the alternatives would be improvements.--Aschlafly 19:38, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
Right now it reads as if our society thrives off the quantifying of physical fitness, not off the actual physical fitness. I understand your point, but it is hidden within the second half of your second sentence. Perhaps a better way of saying it would be "Our society thrives on our physical fitness and mental fitness. To help us improve our physical fitness, we quantify our physical strength [then the list of how we do it]. It is long overdue to create a similar system for mental fitness: ----ToJones 19:42, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
OK, good point. Will add now.--Aschlafly 20:21, 19 October 2008 (EDT)


Rename second half?

The second half is approaches to improving mental strength? Maybe change section heading to reflect this? The way the article is now that section should be approaches to quantifying mental strength. Just change heading to "Approaches to Improving Mental Strength" ? ----ToJones 20:04, 19 October 2008 (EDT)
Good suggestion. Will do.--Aschlafly 20:21, 19 October 2008 (EDT)

Dog attacks

I'm not sure about the inclusion of "dog attacks" in the irrational fears bullet point. Assumedly if a dog is attacking you, you should at least be concerned, especially if the dog is big, snarling, and has big teeth. That's a pretty rational concern. Do you mean fear of dogs in general? I know a girl who had some incident with a dog when she was young and now is deathly afraid of any dogs, even chihuahuas! -Foxtrot 23:57, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

I would argue that not wanting a large dog to chase you or not wanting to get shot are both very rational fears. I think you're trying to link gun control policies with lacking "mental strength," and I don't think it's a good comparison. There's a big difference between being afraid of being shot (if you were in a combat zone, wouldn't you be?) and believing that less guns in society as a whole would reduce crime. Corry 10:45, 21 October 2008 (EDT)
This obviously refers to an irrational or exaggerated fear of dog attacks, or guns. There may be legitimate fears of flying in airplanes, but the "fear of flying" obviously refers to an irrational or exaggerated fear.--Aschlafly 12:33, 21 October 2008 (EDT)