Talk:Julia

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Please be careful about renaming articles I have created without discussion. Thank you. Learn together 20:27, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

What on earth are you going on about? The article is incorrectly named, it needs to redirect to the correct article. Do you want every article about the Julian women pointing to this one page? File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 20:29, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
Rather than an edit war, might I suggest some sort of disambiguation page for "Julia"? Bohdan 20:35, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
And I would suggest that you choose discussion in the future Fox. All you did was reverse the naming convention so that every Julia would now redirect to Julia the Elder. Learn together 20:39, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
No I didn't - I was creating the page for julia when you changed and caused edit conflict. And I'm not going to run every change by you, Learn together - if you had used the correct name in the first place, none of this would have been necessary. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 20:42, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
Your attitude is unfortunate. And yes, discussion is the recommended procedure when dealing with naming changes, especially on an article just created by someone else. The idea of I'm right because I say I am is not going to fly in a team environment, but discussion of your viewpoints is. Learn together 21:19, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
I find your comments incredibly patronizing - this isn't a team environment if everybody has to discuss with you how to fix your mistakes. If you do not know the correct names of the people you are creating pages about, then how are people supposed to navigate to the information? Maybe you should research their names a little more carefully before creating the pages? This isn't an idea of "I'm right because I say I am", its about the simple undeniable fact that you named the article incorrectly. File:User Fox.png Fox (talk|contribs) 04:18, 13 June 2007 (EDT)