Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limousine liberal"
From Conservapedia
(→Democrats: Should we?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If a wealthy person supports social welfare, how does that make them a hypocrite? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 13:21, 15 August 2008 (EDT) | If a wealthy person supports social welfare, how does that make them a hypocrite? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 13:21, 15 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
:I can understand the contradiction in the case of the "Champagne Socialists" (I have also heard them referred to as "Smoked Salmon Socialists", which I think is a wittier name), because socialists claim to be in favour of spreading wealth equally among all people rather than having an elite wealthy class. But in the case of limousine liberals, I just don't see where the hypocrisy lies. Can't someone support giving money to the poor ''and'' be wealthy? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 13:27, 15 August 2008 (EDT) | :I can understand the contradiction in the case of the "Champagne Socialists" (I have also heard them referred to as "Smoked Salmon Socialists", which I think is a wittier name), because socialists claim to be in favour of spreading wealth equally among all people rather than having an elite wealthy class. But in the case of limousine liberals, I just don't see where the hypocrisy lies. Can't someone support giving money to the poor ''and'' be wealthy? [[User:Eoinc|Eoinc]] 13:27, 15 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Democrats == | ||
| + | Should we mention that the [[Democratic Party]] is full of limousine liberals and the Democrats are people fooled by the limousine liberals? [[User:Conservapedian123|Conservapedian123]] 14:21, 20 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:21, March 20, 2011
If a wealthy person supports social welfare, how does that make them a hypocrite? Eoinc 13:21, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
- I can understand the contradiction in the case of the "Champagne Socialists" (I have also heard them referred to as "Smoked Salmon Socialists", which I think is a wittier name), because socialists claim to be in favour of spreading wealth equally among all people rather than having an elite wealthy class. But in the case of limousine liberals, I just don't see where the hypocrisy lies. Can't someone support giving money to the poor and be wealthy? Eoinc 13:27, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
Democrats
Should we mention that the Democratic Party is full of limousine liberals and the Democrats are people fooled by the limousine liberals? Conservapedian123 14:21, 20 March 2011 (EDT)
