Difference between revisions of "Talk:Loch Ness Monster"

Latest revision as of 22:16, November 7, 2008

This statement need attributions if it is true. I personally doubt there has been a survey

It is considered by most to be a legendary hoax. Conservative 12:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)conservative

TWO WORDS: "Tree fiddy" --Cracker^talk 19:38, 23 March 2007 (EDT)

Article needs total re-work

This article has no sourced claims, and gives way to much weight to theories that there really IS a creature. In desperate need of qualification and skepticism. Tmtoulouse 16:01, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Agreed. Nessie exists as much as Sasquatch or the Abominable Snowman From what I've seen/read, Nessie was a hoax from day one. --Lohengrin 16:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Although I personally believe in Nessie, I agree there's no direct proof, and the article should reflect that. Totnesmartin 15:15, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

Link to Video

Can we link to video of the most recent "sighting?" FredK

Oops, my link didn't work. Fixing, I hope. MyaR 15:35, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Urg, forgot how to do the references right, but the link's there with the video. Sorry, gotta run or I'd figure out how to fix it. MyaR 15:42, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Evolutiuonary viewpoint

Could someone set in motion something about the Creationist view of the extinction of the plesiosaurs? JY23 17:16, 7 November 2008 (EST)