Difference between revisions of "Talk:Original sin"
(Unification Church teachings) |
(added segment Revised "creation of man") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I suggest it be removed from this article and added to the [[Unification Church]] under a section called "beliefs". [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:12, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | I suggest it be removed from this article and added to the [[Unification Church]] under a section called "beliefs". [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:12, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Agreed. If you have time, please go ahead and do this. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:16, 30 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Revised "creation of man"== | ||
| + | |||
| + | I revised the imprecise assertion that Jesus is a "creation of man" (which also ''grammatically'' suggests that man made him up as a fictional creation). The revision makes explicit the theological teaching that He is the uncreated, begotten Son and Word of God in His divine nature, and not a creature, although as man in His human nature He is a true member of the creature Man and one with the whole of the creation, but that through him as a man and as representative head and member of the whole body of humanity all of Man has made reparation (atonement) for all human sin, and that the New Creation came into being in Him. --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 18:46, 18 January 2017 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:46, January 18, 2017
I removed the reference to the fall as a 'genetic defect', which is meaningless in the context of the story of Adam and Eve and thoroughly unscientific in its use of the word 'genetic'. I added two balancing interpretations of the Adam and Eve story. Britinme 23:42 30 March 2007 (EDT)
Unification Church teachings
I suggest it be removed from this article and added to the Unification Church under a section called "beliefs". HenryS 16:12, 30 April 2008 (EDT)
Revised "creation of man"
I revised the imprecise assertion that Jesus is a "creation of man" (which also grammatically suggests that man made him up as a fictional creation). The revision makes explicit the theological teaching that He is the uncreated, begotten Son and Word of God in His divine nature, and not a creature, although as man in His human nature He is a true member of the creature Man and one with the whole of the creation, but that through him as a man and as representative head and member of the whole body of humanity all of Man has made reparation (atonement) for all human sin, and that the New Creation came into being in Him. --Dataclarifier (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2017 (EST)
