Talk:Population control

From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KevinS (Talk | contribs) at 16:37, January 8, 2009. It may differ significantly from current revision.

Jump to: navigation, search

Problems with bias in this page

Abortion is nowhere near the most important factor in controlling exponential population expansion. Resisting the natural impulse to have an excessive number of biological children in a family is. --User:Mert


Overcrowded?

Not sure who Paul Ehrlich is or was, and there's no citation given for the statistic that humans occupy only 1 or 2% of the earth's surface, but assuming the figures aren't from as biased a source as the CIA, do we know how much of the earth's land surface CAN be occupied by humans? If the area that CAN'T be occupied by humans, because it's too hot/too cold/too dry etc., is say, for sake of arguement, 80% then the 1 or 2% figure takes on a whole new meaning. BetsyNewson 10:37, 8 January 2009 (EST)


Liberal Socialist Myth

Ignoring some of the other potential issues with this article, regarding the introduction ("Population control is the liberal socialist myth.."), is it really a "socialist" myth? I mean, I don't see anything in the article that suggests it's socialist in nature. Liberal, I'm okay with, but the two terms aren't interchangeable (even if they were, it would be redundant). KevinS 11:37, 8 January 2009 (EST)

Retrieved from "https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Population_control&oldid=605378"