Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rand Paul"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Symbolic murder of Lincoln)
m
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
::Inviting Erdogan while U.S. troops have to withdraw under less than honorable conditions is a kowtow to him. Americans had to withdraw from Vietnam, too, but Nixon wouldn't have invited Ho-Chi-Minh to Washington. And Erdogan and his entourage did behave badly last time, there is zero reason to invite him a second time. It would be a nightmare for the conservatives and for America and for the West as a whole. --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 16:34, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
 
::Inviting Erdogan while U.S. troops have to withdraw under less than honorable conditions is a kowtow to him. Americans had to withdraw from Vietnam, too, but Nixon wouldn't have invited Ho-Chi-Minh to Washington. And Erdogan and his entourage did behave badly last time, there is zero reason to invite him a second time. It would be a nightmare for the conservatives and for America and for the West as a whole. --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 16:34, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
::"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." These words were in opposition to slavery back then and are in opposition to Erdogan now. If Erdogan is invited to Washington under these circumstances, the Republican party is finished. Is that the hidden aim? --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 17:00, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
+
:::"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." These words were in opposition to slavery back then and are in opposition to Erdogan now. If Erdogan is invited to Washington under these circumstances, the Republican party is finished. Is that the hidden aim? --[[User:James2|James2]] ([[User talk:James2|talk]]) 17:00, 14 October 2019 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:01, October 14, 2019

Does Rand Paul support the legalization of cannabis like his father does? --MorningStar 15:53, 20 May 2010 (EDT)

On November 13, Turkish ruler Erdogan is coming to Washington again.[1] Now it's the way of Erdogan vs. the way of Liberty. What way to go should be clear to every Libertarian!--James2 (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2019 (EDT)

Maybe this is a fight for the Turks, not Americans. The values of the U.S. founding fathers are superior to those of Erdogan, but that doesn't mean we should force those values on others. --1990'sguy (talk) 19:49, 12 October 2019 (EDT)
Inviting Erdogan while U.S. troops have to withdraw under less than honorable conditions is a kowtow to him. Americans had to withdraw from Vietnam, too, but Nixon wouldn't have invited Ho-Chi-Minh to Washington. And Erdogan and his entourage did behave badly last time, there is zero reason to invite him a second time. It would be a nightmare for the conservatives and for America and for the West as a whole. --James2 (talk) 16:34, 14 October 2019 (EDT)
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." These words were in opposition to slavery back then and are in opposition to Erdogan now. If Erdogan is invited to Washington under these circumstances, the Republican party is finished. Is that the hidden aim? --James2 (talk) 17:00, 14 October 2019 (EDT)