Talk:Rick Santorum

From Conservapedia
This is the current revision of Talk:Rick Santorum as edited by Jja1 (Talk | contribs) at 02:03, March 7, 2012. This URL is a permanent link to this version of this page.

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Obsessed? HelpJazz 19:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

What would you say? HenryS 19:28, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
I was going to look at the reference to see if I could pick out a better word, but there wasn't one. So without doing any research of my own, I would say something like "there was an increase of media coverage after..." or some such verifiable claim. HelpJazz 20:29, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
Oh man I just read more of the article and saw "cult-like" and "forthright and truthful". And no sources :( I should have quit while I was ahead. HelpJazz 20:32, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Senselessly

Maybe Santorum is running for VP; he'd reunite social conservatives to a Romney/Santorum ticket. Rob Smith 19:11, 28 January 2012 (EST)

Meh.... Romney's socially conservative enough for most voters. The issue is his view on economic issues, which is why I think he would pick a Tea Party fiscal conservative like Rand Paul. Santorum isn't very conservative on most fiscal issues, and neither is Romney. He needs someone who is to balance the ticket. Santorum/Romney makes more sense, with Santorum choosing a moderate to get some independents in. Gregkochuconn 09:54, 17 February 2012 (EST)

Endorsement

When is Conservapedia going to endorse this man? Time is running out. If no one objects I'll add our endorsement soon. --CraigF 01:21, 17 February 2012 (EST)

Nah, Newt is our man [1]. --DamianJohn 02:23, 17 February 2012 (EST)

^ Agreed. Santorum is an extreme social conservative and has no clue what he's doing when it comes to finance. --Jja1 21:03, 6 March 2012 (EST)