Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skepchick"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Alright I will do that in future [[User:Irishtory|Irishtory]] ([[User talk:Irishtory|talk]]) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT) | ::Alright I will do that in future [[User:Irishtory|Irishtory]] ([[User talk:Irishtory|talk]]) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::: | + | :::Your request is petty. Clearly, an atheist/agnostic website which strenuously advocates science/rationality, should have contributors who practice sound practices when it comes to [[nutritional science]], [[exercise science]] and [[medical science]]. That is not too much to ask. See also: [[Atheism and unscientific medical practices]] |
:::In addition, eating is a rudimentary part of regulating one's biological functions, so website which advocates [[evolution]]ary pseudoscience which has contributors who fail to understand [[applied biology]] is worth noting. See also: [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]. | :::In addition, eating is a rudimentary part of regulating one's biological functions, so website which advocates [[evolution]]ary pseudoscience which has contributors who fail to understand [[applied biology]] is worth noting. See also: [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]. | ||
:::You may not edit this article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:11, 18 May 2019 (EDT) | :::You may not edit this article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:11, 18 May 2019 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:15, May 18, 2019
Part of this article seems a bit petty. I'm planning to remove it on those grounds. If I'm making mistake please let me know. Irishtory (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
- This should be discussed on the talk page before making any changes to the article, especially so CP's administrators can consider whatever you propose. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:04, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
- Alright I will do that in future Irishtory (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
- Your request is petty. Clearly, an atheist/agnostic website which strenuously advocates science/rationality, should have contributors who practice sound practices when it comes to nutritional science, exercise science and medical science. That is not too much to ask. See also: Atheism and unscientific medical practices
- Alright I will do that in future Irishtory (talk) 16:09, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
- In addition, eating is a rudimentary part of regulating one's biological functions, so website which advocates evolutionary pseudoscience which has contributors who fail to understand applied biology is worth noting. See also: Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese.
- You may not edit this article.Conservative (talk) 18:11, 18 May 2019 (EDT)
