Difference between revisions of "User:Benp"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Might as well stop procrastinating and get started on this.
+
{{template:retired}}
  
As for "harmless card games," are you suggesting that games like poker and blackjack can't help foster amorality and outright immorality? Doubtless that's why Las Vegas is such a bastion of Christian virtue and decency. I personally know of at least one incident in which a child who played one of these fantasy card games was attacked and robbed by an adult because the cards he was carrying were "rare and powerful." --Benp 10:07, 11 August 2009 (EDT)
+
==Taking some time off==
  
How is that the fault of the card game?
+
Since my userpage mysteriously reverted to a previous version, I guess I need to repost this.
Since when do they play Magic:TG in Vegas?
+
What does Vegas have to do with anything?
+
-TheHeroExcelsior
+
  
:You mentioned poker and blackjack as other "harmless" card games.  I was pointing out exactly what kind of morality is exhibited by a town DEDICATED to such "harmless" gamesIt seems entirely relevant to me.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 10:25, 11 August 2009 (EDT)
+
I have been a member of this project, more or less actively, for quite some time now.  In that time, there have been numerous changes.  I feel that some of these have been good, and others have been detrimental. 
 +
 
 +
I have never taken issue with the notion that certain members of the project have more authority than others.  Andy is the founder of the project, as well as the person who graciously provides the site; of course his voice should have the most weightLikewise, the sysops have demonstrated their value and reliability, and their voices should also carry great weight.  That is only right and proper.
 +
 
 +
The problem is that...at this time...I find that I cannot agree with the direction in which one of those voices is leading this project.  Many of the articles appearing recently are not of a sort I would care to have a student or child of mine readMoreover, I feel that entirely too much focus is being placed on attracting the attention and ire of atheists and vandals, rather than producing content valuable to Christians and conservatives.
 +
 
 +
Again, it is not my place to debate the wisdom of this course of actionHowever, it is not a course of action I care to support.  Thus, I have two options: get with the program or get going.  Since I am unwilling to get with this particular program, it's time to get going, at least for now.
 +
 
 +
I hope to return at some later date; I still think this project has great potential. 
 +
 
 +
Mr. Schlafly, thank you for the opportunity to edit here.  To my fellow editors, good luck and may God bless.
 +
 
 +
Respectfully,
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 23:03, 5 October 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 03:05, October 6, 2011


RETIRED


Taking some time off

Since my userpage mysteriously reverted to a previous version, I guess I need to repost this.

I have been a member of this project, more or less actively, for quite some time now. In that time, there have been numerous changes. I feel that some of these have been good, and others have been detrimental.

I have never taken issue with the notion that certain members of the project have more authority than others. Andy is the founder of the project, as well as the person who graciously provides the site; of course his voice should have the most weight. Likewise, the sysops have demonstrated their value and reliability, and their voices should also carry great weight. That is only right and proper.

The problem is that...at this time...I find that I cannot agree with the direction in which one of those voices is leading this project. Many of the articles appearing recently are not of a sort I would care to have a student or child of mine read. Moreover, I feel that entirely too much focus is being placed on attracting the attention and ire of atheists and vandals, rather than producing content valuable to Christians and conservatives.

Again, it is not my place to debate the wisdom of this course of action. However, it is not a course of action I care to support. Thus, I have two options: get with the program or get going. Since I am unwilling to get with this particular program, it's time to get going, at least for now.

I hope to return at some later date; I still think this project has great potential.

Mr. Schlafly, thank you for the opportunity to edit here. To my fellow editors, good luck and may God bless.

Respectfully,

--Benp 23:03, 5 October 2011 (EDT)