Difference between revisions of "User talk:BabeTruth2"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::: Maybe it isn't any different. I haven't seen those articles, and any gossip there should be removed also. It's not an encyclopedia if it has gossip. It's the National Enquirer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ::: Maybe it isn't any different. I haven't seen those articles, and any gossip there should be removed also. It's not an encyclopedia if it has gossip. It's the National Enquirer.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ahem Andy, meaning no disrepect but this is on the Gore page, uncited might I add | ||
| + | |||
| + | In 2007, Al Gore received criticism for his high electricity use. When it was discovered that Gore's electric utility bill is 20 times higher than the average American's[22] many of his detractors accused him of not living up to his own standards. In the year since the 2007 criticism, energy use at Gore's mansion increased 10%.[23] Gore's defenders claim that the majority of that power came from "green", or environmentally friendly, power sources such as solar and wind power. These power sources are much more expensive than traditional power sources such as coal and nuclear power | ||
| + | |||
| + | In which case, you won't mind me deleating it | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I'll take a chance on you and leave your account active, in case this was a genuine misunderstanding of the [[rules]]. Feel free to edit out gossip from those other entries. This is an educational and intellectual resource, and please improve it while adhering to what we just discussed. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 01:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:01, January 20, 2010
Yes, you will be blocked again, because you are posting gossip inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Your posting is not educational in any way.--Aschlafly 00:54, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
P.S. Our rules are clear and violators are blocked.--Aschlafly 00:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? Or information on Barack Obama's drug use? Or on Al Gore's energy usage? I challenge you to explain the difference. --BabeTruth2 00:58, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Maybe it isn't any different. I haven't seen those articles, and any gossip there should be removed also. It's not an encyclopedia if it has gossip. It's the National Enquirer.--Aschlafly 01:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
ahem Andy, meaning no disrepect but this is on the Gore page, uncited might I add
In 2007, Al Gore received criticism for his high electricity use. When it was discovered that Gore's electric utility bill is 20 times higher than the average American's[22] many of his detractors accused him of not living up to his own standards. In the year since the 2007 criticism, energy use at Gore's mansion increased 10%.[23] Gore's defenders claim that the majority of that power came from "green", or environmentally friendly, power sources such as solar and wind power. These power sources are much more expensive than traditional power sources such as coal and nuclear power
In which case, you won't mind me deleating it
- I'll take a chance on you and leave your account active, in case this was a genuine misunderstanding of the rules. Feel free to edit out gossip from those other entries. This is an educational and intellectual resource, and please improve it while adhering to what we just discussed. Thanks.--Aschlafly 01:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
