User talk:BabeTruth2
From Conservapedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aschlafly (Talk | contribs) at 05:10, March 22, 2007. It may differ significantly from current revision.
Yes, you will be blocked again, because you are posting gossip inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Your posting is not educational in any way.--Aschlafly 00:54, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
P.S. Our rules are clear and violators are blocked.--Aschlafly 00:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- And how is an entire article speculating on Darwin's mental health any different? Or information on Barack Obama's drug use? Or on Al Gore's energy usage? I challenge you to explain the difference. --BabeTruth2 00:58, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- Maybe it isn't any different. I haven't seen those articles, and any gossip there should be removed also. It's not an encyclopedia if it has gossip. It's the National Enquirer.--Aschlafly 01:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
- I'll take a chance on you and leave your account active, in case this was a genuine misunderstanding of the rules. Feel free to edit out gossip from those other entries. This is an educational and intellectual resource, and please improve it while adhering to what we just discussed. Thanks.--Aschlafly 01:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
