User talk:LeonardO

Useful links

• How to edit a wiki
• CP Commandments
• CP Guidelines
• Style Manual
• Editing Etiquette
• How to create and maintain high-quality articles
• Report Problems
• List of Templates

Welcome!

Hello, LeonardO, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, LeonardO!

Joaquín Martínez 12:27, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

Hoatzin

Basic stuff for now - just to get a structure going - but feel free to add to it as much detail as possible, up to and including why a stupid bird should decide on its own to get back the claws abandoned by its supposed ancestors. Karajou 11:38, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

Oh, don't get me wrong, I think it's a very good article! I do not believe in Evolution, and the reason why I asked for more information is because I am curious about the details, and also because I believe that adding a paragraph about its claws would improve the quality of the article and make it stronger! I would write something myself but I haven't done any research on the matter. So, if I am correct, the development of claws in the wings of the hoatzin goes against Evolution because it would represent an unexplicable evolutionary step backward for the species? If I can find the right wording I might already add a stub paragraph to the article :) --Leo-from-UK 11:42, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

You hit the nail on the head; it is an unexplicable - unexplainable - evolutionary step backward. In order to properly explain this animal, evolutionists have to explain a reason for it to get these claws back, which means giving the hoatzin an intelligence it doesn't possess. Karajou 11:48, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

Thanks for clearing things up for me. I added a few words to the article to make it clearer for everyone WHY such a feature goes against Evolution, but I still believe that it would be nice to expand on it, and to give this matter its own paragraph in the article, eventually. It is not a high priority, of course. --Leo-from-UK 11:59, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

Superb!

Excellent completion of the final term to complete the perfect doubling by century at Essay:Best New Conservative Words!--Andy Schlafly 16:13, 23 June 2011 (EDT)