|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Ken, I'm a Catholic. [[User:Rockford the Roe|Rockford the Roe]] ([[User talk:Rockford the Roe|talk]]) 20:17, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | Moved to [[User talk: RockfordRoe]] |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[File:Orange Order flag.png|left|thumbnail|One of the editors of the User: Conservative account is a staunch [[Protestant]]. ]]
| + | |
| − | :Hey Ken, why did you feel like you needed to edit my talkpage to let me know about you being a Protestant? I know I'm technically "invading" your wiki, but I made this account to prove a point and to maybe share some info to Andrew's homeschool (If they still use this) of some more techy stuff they'd have a hard time finding. [[User:Rockford the Roe|Rockford the Roe]] ([[User talk:Rockford the Roe|talk]]) 20:41, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :::Why do you feel the need to inform a person you believe is called Ken that your a Catholic? By the way, more than one editor uses the [[User: Conservative]] account.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:49, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::::[https://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Rockford_the_Roe&diff=1737819&oldid=1737804 The initial creation of this talkpage implies that I'm an atheist]. [[User:Rockford the Roe|Rockford the Roe]] ([[User talk:Rockford the Roe|talk]]) 20:58, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::::And another thing, I'm not buying that multiple people run that account because its writing style is very consistent. [[User:Rockford the Roe|Rockford the Roe]] ([[User talk:Rockford the Roe|talk]]) 21:16, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Check the writing style and footnoting style of the article [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] compared to other articles posted by the User: Conservative account. You might not be "buying it", neverthless while you are entitled to your opinion, you are not entitled to your own facts. For example, the footnoting style of [[Atheism and the persecution of homosexuals]] created by the User: Conservative account is very different from the other articles created using the User: Conservative account. In addition, the IQs of both editors of the User: Conservative account are above average so they may share similar characteristics in terms of vocabularies, complexity of sentence structures, etc. I rest my case in this matter knowing that I am quite victorious![[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:27, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | By the way, you may be an atheist. I cite at RW: "nuzzles on kenny's keyboard UwU daddy, i wove the way youw destwoy atheism in the twente fiwst centuwee". - Rockford the Roe, 15:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)"[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:30, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | P.S. I suggest reading these two essays: [[Essay: Atheist gentlemen, what we have here is a failure to communicate]] and [[Essay: Will atheism ever disappear?]]. I hope this clarifies things for you.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:55, 17 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | ::::Thou shalt not bear false witness--[[User:Gogo1|Gogo1]] ([[User talk:Gogo1|talk]]) 02:20, 18 March 2021 (EDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == The uncivilized wiki ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | [[File:Gavel.jpg|thumbnail|300px|center|A RationalWiki editor whose username is Christopher wrote at RationalWiki: "Technically...[User: Conservative at Conservapedia].. "shouldn’t have been banned, the vote to ban him was one short of the 2/3 majority that’s needed according to site policy."<ref>[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Chicken_coop&diff=prev&oldid=2296799 Revision as of 21:46, 11 March 2021 (view source) Christopher (talk | contribs)]</ref>
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | In short, RationalWiki broke its own rules when they permabaned me. According to RationalWiki rules, a permaban requires a 66% majority. RationalWiki permabanned me without such a majority.
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | Of course, this proves once again that atheism provides no foundation in terms of having a civilized society and that [[Atheist hypocrisy|atheists are often hypocrites]] (see: [[ Atheism and its anti-civilizational effects]] and [[Atheism and culture]] and [[Atheism and human rights]] and [[Atheism and human rights violations]]).
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | And much to the chagrin of RationalWikians who wished to "permaban" me, I can edit RationalWiki whenever I want through creating new accounts.
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | And gentlemen, always remember that in your Chicken Coop kangaroo court, I was not judged by a jury of my peers.
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | One of the administrators of your website who voted in your so-called "trial", namely Oxyaena, admits he is "probably raging too much most of the time to form coherent sentences".
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | On May 24,2020, which is the day he voted on whether a fellow editor (namely me) should be permabanned from the website, the RationalWiki editor who goes by the moniker Amassivegay wrote: "I am never sure I am even coherent most of the time."
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | <br />
| + | |
| − | Gentlemen, you had madmen on the jury! Sad!]]
| + | |
| − | {{Clear}}
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ==References==
| + | |
| − | <References/>
| + | |
