Difference between revisions of "User talk:RossC"
(warning of blocking) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: RossC, your last 23 edits have been talk, talk, talk. Either you don't understand the [[rules]] here or you choose to violate them. Let's see some substantive edits soon or else the [[rules]] will require blocking your account. Appreciate what an encyclopedic wiki is: a place to learn by increasing your knowledge, not a place for endless chatter. Do yourself a favor and learn by writing. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:56, 10 December 2007 (EST) | : RossC, your last 23 edits have been talk, talk, talk. Either you don't understand the [[rules]] here or you choose to violate them. Let's see some substantive edits soon or else the [[rules]] will require blocking your account. Appreciate what an encyclopedic wiki is: a place to learn by increasing your knowledge, not a place for endless chatter. Do yourself a favor and learn by writing. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:56, 10 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==hello== | ||
| + | Ross, I really enjoyed your opinion on the mall shooting in the "debate" section. I really can't understand why you are not banned yet for giving your own opinion like that here! lol. [[user:thegovernator|thegovernator]] | ||
Revision as of 22:49, December 24, 2007
Don't say, "obvious glee to be able to report that he attended public school". That's getting personal. Come back tomorrow. --Ed Poor Talk 20:15, 6 December 2007 (EST)
90/10
Ross, have a look at the CP commandments and Manual of Style before you edit anymore. You should know what the rules are before you edit. The 90/10 rule is the rule that 90% of your edits can't be talk edits - at least 10% have to be substantial article edits.--IDuan 22:16, 10 December 2007 (EST)
- Okay, thanks for the tip. Got a feeling I won't be around to put it into action, though... :] --RossC 22:24, 10 December 2007 (EST)
Hi
I think both of us should lay back on pointing out hypocrisy on this site. For now, concentrate on contributing and perhaps someday our opinions will be valued more. If you are here for the same reasons that I am (A healthy belief that political discourse requires more than one voice, children need more than one idea to grow intellectually) then you will understand there are certain things we have to do to not get banned. It'll be hard, but we should both give it a go. :-) MarcusCicero 22:19, 10 December 2007 (EST)
- Yeah, you're right--but that particular hobby-horse of His really burns me.--RossC 22:27, 10 December 2007 (EST)
- RossC, your last 23 edits have been talk, talk, talk. Either you don't understand the rules here or you choose to violate them. Let's see some substantive edits soon or else the rules will require blocking your account. Appreciate what an encyclopedic wiki is: a place to learn by increasing your knowledge, not a place for endless chatter. Do yourself a favor and learn by writing. Thanks.--Aschlafly 22:56, 10 December 2007 (EST)
hello
Ross, I really enjoyed your opinion on the mall shooting in the "debate" section. I really can't understand why you are not banned yet for giving your own opinion like that here! lol. thegovernator
