Difference between revisions of "Whistleblower Statutes"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(See also)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''whistleblower statute''' is a law that protects employees and sometimes other workers when they complain about misconduct at a company or government agency.
+
A '''whistleblower statute''' is a [[law]] that protects [[employee]]s and sometimes other workers when they complain about misconduct at a [[company]] or [[government]] [[agency]].
  
An example is the California Business and Professional Code 2056, which is based on AB 1676 (Margolin, 3/4/1993).  This encourages physicians to report misconduct to authorities and gives them protection against retaliation by health care organizations such as medical staffs and governing entities.  The California Medical Association (CMA) used this law in connection with the ''Potvin v. Met Life'' case.
+
An example is the [[California]] Business and Professional Code 2056, which is based on AB 1676 (Margolin, 3/4/1993).  This encourages [[physician]]s to report misconduct to authorities and gives them protection against retaliation by health care organizations such as medical staffs and governing entities.  The California Medical Association (CMA) used this law in connection with the ''Potvin v. Met Life'' case.
 +
 
 +
==See also==
 +
*[[Leak]]
 +
*[[Operation Fast and Furious]]
 +
*[[Murder of Seth Rich]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Law]]

Latest revision as of 21:49, November 26, 2018

A whistleblower statute is a law that protects employees and sometimes other workers when they complain about misconduct at a company or government agency.

An example is the California Business and Professional Code 2056, which is based on AB 1676 (Margolin, 3/4/1993). This encourages physicians to report misconduct to authorities and gives them protection against retaliation by health care organizations such as medical staffs and governing entities. The California Medical Association (CMA) used this law in connection with the Potvin v. Met Life case.

See also