Talk:John Maynard Keynes and pederasty

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Why is this here?

Is this article really needed? It is almost exactly word for word the same as the section in the Maynard Keynes main article. At the very most this should probably just be a redirect. TonyB 20:56, 11 April 2011 (EDT)

Is your talk page comment really needed? conservative 21:08, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
Yes TonyB 21:08, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
Without it, I wouldn't be able to start a discussion TonyB 21:09, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
Is this discussion necessary. If so, why? conservative 21:17, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
This discussion is necessary, because like all adult discussion it helps to foster communication, and it means that people are better able to work together to improve upon projects and other situations. Through this discussion, I was hoping too discuss whether this article really needs to exist or not, because it my personal opinion, it isn't really needed. Of course, people are free to object to that. TonyB 21:21, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
TonyB, please feel free to add more content to the article. Here are some resources for you to investigate. conservative 21:38, 11 April 2011 (EDT)

Looks like I might as well. TonyB 21:40, 11 April 2011 (EDT)

Article needs to be deleted

It claims he is a pedophile despite no evidence that he had sexual relations with prepubescent children. Needs to be deleted as soon as possible. Nightsky 17:08, 7 October 2012 (EDT)

Could you give more evidence or references about your claim? --Joaquín Martínez 23:21, 7 October 2012 (EDT)