Difference between revisions of "User:Conservative/mailbox"

Revision as of 21:02, March 28, 2024

Hi Conservative. I hope you are well. I've been away from Conservapedia for a bit. I pray you and your family are doing well in the Lord.

Would you like to contribute to this article if you have time? Given the past articles you've authored, Conservative, I think this one will be right up your alley. You may like it and find it enjoyable to do so. I have great hopes for this end times harvest miraculously prophesied in Mat 24:14 that is currently going on. https://conservapedia.com/Debate:_Will_Christianity_reach_3_billion_adherents_by_2030 One area that is sure to bring more fruit to the Kingdom of God than ever before is the area of Internet evangelism which both of us I know are very interested in! Interesting times we live in!

Pray you are well. In Our Lord Jesus, Nishant X. God Bless. NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 04:33, 26 March 2021 (EDT)

There are scholars at the Center for the Study of Global Christianity, which is at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, indicating that the number of self-identified Christians will hit 3.2 billion by 2025 (See: Status of Global Christianity, 2023, in the Context of 1900–2050). Conservative (talk) 13:43, June 26, 2023 (EDT)

Hi Cons. I clicked on your link, and I think the 3.2 BN number is by 2050, no? NishantXavier^{For Christ the King} 13:58, June 26, 2023 (EDT)

Updated message: I admire your zeal. We discussed this matter at Conservapedia and off wiki in the past and let's continue to do so. And I know that you're going to put your shoulder to the wheel. Conservative (talk) 04:13, November 15, 2023 (EST)

Merry Christmas to you to you too!

I watched the Task and Purpose video. Thanks! - unsigned by User:PeterKa

You're welcome. I am glad you found the video informative. Conservative (talk) 08:35, December 23, 2023 (EST)

Happy New Year

Kudos on the: Humorous conservative videos. Nice.Telling (talk) 23:31, January 2, 2024 (EST)

Thanks. Conservative (talk) 23:31, January 2, 2024 (EST)

Big kudos

Kudos to your recent essay Essay: December 2021 was a pivotal moment in the future of global politics for decades to come. It was very informative and insightful. Any anti-American reading this article is sure to be triggered! Karajou (talk) 13:45, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

Karajou, thank you for your kind words about my most recent essay. It certainly encourages me to write more essays down the pike. In the coming years, both communist China and Russia face serious problems and based on recent events, it doesn't appear as if they are up to the task of triumphing over these major problems. Conservative (talk) 15:13, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

There's nothing to read. All it is is a bunch of redundant spam links to neocon sites.

And he's already on record denying that global politics would be changed for the next 30 years 3 months later. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 14:32, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

You are certainly entitled to your opinion RobSmith.

But there is no denying that China is experiencing major economic troubles at the present time and that Evergrande defaulting on various creditors in December 2021 sent shock waves throughout its economy.

And in this case, as in most cases, the world of facts triumphs over the world of subjective opinions.

By the way, I definitely noticed that you didn't write out a counter essay and instead bellyached on User: Aschlafly's talk page. This is very sad because you already know Andy's position on this matter. Andy wrote: "...I think there should be more leeway for strong editors to create essays and categorize them as they think best. That includes you too. Essays are a valuable part of this website (in contrast with the tyranny at Wikipedia which prohibits them). The essay author is easily identified from the entry history.--Andy Schlafly (talk) 21:26, December 22, 2023 (EST)".

I predict that Andy will not respond to your whining on his talk page and will totally ignore your saber rattling ultimatum. Conservative (talk) 14:52, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

Reread this foreign policy discussion from 2018, all subsections, and it's pretty obvious you're just peeing in the wind right now. Until you connect the dots between the Steele dossier and the NATO war in Ukraine, you and I don't really have much to talk about. You sound like Rachel Maddow. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 15:43, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

Reread? As I have told you a number of times now, I am not interested in your reading your political opinions such as you trying to deny that China is a communist country. The world is filled with opinions. I prefer to take an investigative approach to life and discover relevant and important facts. Conservative (talk) 15:56, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

No, it's a foreign policy discussion you, me, Pokeria and some others had in Sept 2018 in MPR talk. Just reread your own comments. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 16:03, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

I realize it's your userspace, but you're already posting redundant arguments and redundant spam. Can you stick to the subject at hand? RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 16:12, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

I am not interested in your reading suggestions. Nor am I interested in having a discussion with you about international relations and world politics when I can spend that time looking at material on these matters from people who are far more informed than you. It's a matter of opportunity cost. It's not like you are a world reknowned expert on such matters.

There are so many self-important and ill-formed people when it comes to such matters which I cover in my essay at: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?

With that in mind, we do have a constitional right to freedom of association in the United States which is a very good thing as having discussions with cordial and very informed people is a great thing as is reading great works (See: Cut toxic people out of your life and replace them with edifying achievers who inspire you and The power of upgrading your social network and reading excellent works).

I encourage you to go to Twitter or political forums if you wish to have world politics discussions because you will have no such discussions with me. Conservative (talk) 16:33, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

Ok.

Let me remind you, I returned to Conservapedia at your request about May 2016 to write the Hillary Clinton article. The anti-Trump conspiracy began about June 2015. I documented it for 3 years+ by Sept. 2018, when you and Pokeria were trying to figure out who wrote the Steele dossier, per MSM sources. By that time Russiagate had well over 1,000,000 hits and Conservapedia readers already had answers to all your and Pokeria's questions.

You need to realize Russiagate was all about Trump's anti-NATO statements. So was Trump's impeachment. So is the anti-Trump activity right now. Re-read your comments from 2018 before you go off on "the leading power" or multipolarity.

You, Biden, and Nikki Haley are the only people still pitching unipolarity. RobS^{Zelensky didn't kill himself} 16:48, March 28, 2024 (EDT)

I am still totally not interested in your political opinions or contentions RobSmith. There are plenty of people who are more reliable and informed than you. Please take your political opinions elsewhere.

Good political opinion salesman and zealots move on when their prospects are not interested. I suggest you do the same. Pestering people has never been a winning tactic of persuasion as it smacks of desperation and weakness. Conservative (talk) 17:02, March 28, 2024 (EDT)