Conservapedia:AFD Essay: Ephebophilia
Largely cut n paste from Wikipedia, with a concluding Introductory stream-of-consciouness paragraph using various buzzwords and phrases designed to make it look acceptable to Conservapedia family friendly guidelines. RobSZ+ 15:59, July 30, 2022 (EDT)
It doesn't deserve to be deleted. It's also utterly disrespectful towards those who worked on it previously and deletes a very important piece of information. It's not taken from Wikipedia, but from different sites who may partly use the same sources and the same definition used by Wikipedia and from different encyclopedias online on the internet specialized in this topic and argument (including the examples of the scholars listed, they're not only on Wikipedia). Plus, there is also part of original source as you can see (that can't use, unfortunately, tweets and posts from other socials, also because they are infinite), but it doesn't justify its deletion. This is very radical, exaggerated and disrespectful. And also the advice category "Essay" should be removed and make it a normal Conservapedia page again. P.S. "Buzzwords and phrases"? "To make it look acceptable"? What? Which buzzwords? We're talking about facts here, not "buzzwords/phrases" whatever they are, just facts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:|]] [[User talk:|(talk)]]
As already said, there's no valid reason to delete the page for the reasons explained above and there's no use to keep this deletion advice.User:Republiproud
- Again, please sign your comments with four tildes like this: ~~~~. RobSZ+ 20:43, August 1, 2022 (EDT)
Done. ~~~~ User:Republiproud
Why don't you simply tell me what you want removed particularly you deem problematic so to remove the deletion request and the "Essay" category? ~~~~ User:Republiproud
Well? ~~~~ User:Republiproud