User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
September 3, 2007
September 1, 2007
August 30, 2007
August 29, 2007
August 28, 2007
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?
Don't try to mix science and religion--doing so destroys the benefits of both.
+1,776
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?
Whoops, forgot to sign the comment
+63
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?
no edit summary
+340
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?
Line-by-line refutation of Ed Poor's claims about the assumptions we should be challenging.
+3,981
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?
Reject ID as science because it makes to attempt to substantiate any of its claims--an acid test for what is science.
+510
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools?
Keep science and religion seperate. They serve two (Equally legitimate) purposes.
+1,287