13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 57:
Line 57: + + + +
Debate:Is the evidence in favor of evolution convincing? (view source)
Revision as of 00:17, August 29, 2007
, 00:17, August 29, 2007→Because your religion demands it
==Because your religion demands it==
==Because your religion demands it==
The Humanist religion demands that you adopt the faith of evolution. I see everyone of that faith has chimed in together on that issue. That's good for you then. For the rest of us non-believers are yet to see any, and I mean any convincing evidence. Still only a theory, and always will be. Except for those of you with greater faith then me of course. Non-theistic religions need alot of that too.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:09, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
The Humanist religion demands that you adopt the faith of evolution. I see everyone of that faith has chimed in together on that issue. That's good for you then. For the rest of us non-believers are yet to see any, and I mean any convincing evidence. Still only a theory, and always will be. Except for those of you with greater faith then me of course. Non-theistic religions need alot of that too.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 19:09, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Roopilots6, why so cold? :-)
It seems as if your response to everything regarding evolution and related is "Bah, humanists!" However, there's never any warranted argument there, or perhaps I am missing it. All you say is "I'm not convinced!" Could that be because ''your'' religion demands that you believe in Creationism? Sounds like a personal problem. ;-) Seriously, though, the point of Evolution is that it seeks proof. This is at odds with your claim that evolution is part of the "Humanist Religion" [[User:Bluecarrot16|Bluecarrot16]] 20:17, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
==These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions==
==These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions==
These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions. I suggest creating some noteworthy articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:40, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions. I suggest creating some noteworthy articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:40, 31 July 2007 (EDT)