Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 61: Line 61:     
It seems as if your response to everything regarding evolution and related is "Bah, humanists!" However, there's never any warranted argument there, or perhaps I am missing it. All you say is "I'm not convinced!" Could that be because ''your'' religion demands that you believe in Creationism? Sounds like a personal problem. ;-) Seriously, though, the point of Evolution is that it seeks proof. This is at odds with your claim that evolution is part of the "Humanist Religion" [[User:Bluecarrot16|Bluecarrot16]] 20:17, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
 
It seems as if your response to everything regarding evolution and related is "Bah, humanists!" However, there's never any warranted argument there, or perhaps I am missing it. All you say is "I'm not convinced!" Could that be because ''your'' religion demands that you believe in Creationism? Sounds like a personal problem. ;-) Seriously, though, the point of Evolution is that it seeks proof. This is at odds with your claim that evolution is part of the "Humanist Religion" [[User:Bluecarrot16|Bluecarrot16]] 20:17, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Humanism is a type of religion, even if it does not have churches. In order to be a humanist, or a secular progressive, one has to accept all there beliefs. You obviously do. --[[User:Todd16|Todd]] 20:20, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
    
==These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions==
 
==These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions==
 
These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions.  I suggest creating some noteworthy articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:40, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
 
These debates are silly as there are very few footnotes backing up assertions.  I suggest creating some noteworthy articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:40, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
72

edits

Navigation menu