User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 05:14, February 17, 2012 diff hist +167 Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics →Discuss here before deleting information
- 05:06, February 17, 2012 diff hist +154 Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics →Discuss here before deleting information
- 05:05, February 17, 2012 diff hist +584 Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics →Discuss here before deleting information
- 04:53, February 17, 2012 diff hist +136 Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics →Discuss here before deleting information
- 04:52, February 17, 2012 diff hist +235 Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics →Discuss here before deleting information
- 04:47, February 17, 2012 diff hist +557 Talk:Second Law of Thermodynamics →Discuss here before deleting information
- 04:43, February 17, 2012 diff hist -665 Second Law of Thermodynamics Undo revision 962287 by Aschlafly (talk)Your edits are wrong. Let's discuss this on the talk page, so I can explain WHY they're wrong.
- 04:41, February 17, 2012 diff hist +6 Francisco d'Anconia Birth date is not from the novel.
- 04:40, February 17, 2012 diff hist -665 Second Law of Thermodynamics Undo revision 962277 by Aschlafly (talk)Do you even know what the Second Law says? It ONLY applies to closed systems!
- 04:30, February 17, 2012 diff hist +14 Second Law of Thermodynamics "Spontaneously" is an important word. Otherwise your fridge would violate the Second Law.
- 04:29, February 17, 2012 diff hist -188 Second Law of Thermodynamics Removing false statement AGAIN... Please discuss before reverting.
- 04:26, February 17, 2012 diff hist -375 Second Law of Thermodynamics →The three forms of the Second Law of Thermodynamics: The Second Law applies only to closed systems.
- 04:25, February 17, 2012 diff hist -116 Second Law of Thermodynamics Discuss this.
- 04:24, February 17, 2012 diff hist +188 Second Law of Thermodynamics Undo revision 962270 by DonauKind (talk)Restoring accurate edit. Discuss before reverting.
- 04:20, February 17, 2012 diff hist -188 Second Law of Thermodynamics That's wrong too. Even intelligent intervention can't reduce entropy in a closed system. To say it can is to misrepresent the Second Law.
- 04:16, February 17, 2012 diff hist -116 Second Law of Thermodynamics Undo revision 962266 by AschlaflyThe Second Law has nothing to do with evolutionism and we shouldn't say it does. Please discuss before reverting this again.
- 03:44, February 17, 2012 diff hist +61 Talk:James Taggart current
- 03:44, February 17, 2012 diff hist +184 New! Talk:James Taggart Created page with "When you say thing slike "Taggart was born in 1977" can you make clear that this is based on the film instead of the novel? --~~~~"
- 03:41, February 17, 2012 diff hist +188 James Taggart
- 03:39, February 17, 2012 diff hist -116 Second Law of Thermodynamics No it doesn't. There's plenty of evidence against evolution, but the Second Law isn't part of it.
- 02:33, February 17, 2012 diff hist -99 Elevatorgate →Aftermath of Elevatorgate: Replacing irrelevant info with more aftermath.
- 02:28, February 17, 2012 diff hist +289 Talk:Richard Dawkins' Elevatorgate comments →Nominate for Merge: new section current