Page history
September 4, 2019
March 13, 2019
March 12, 2019
September 26, 2018
June 19, 2018
September 2, 2017
August 31, 2017
July 15, 2017
We all know the reason for the word "constitutional", but the article should still point it out.
+372
→Murder rate: Please keep the Breitbart ref.
+293
→Murder rate: Try this. Now I gotta see how the actual refs turned out.
+45
July 14, 2017
He may be a columist, but you are using a double standard by labeling some sources as opinion and not others in other articles. I do not even see left-wing articles marked as opinion. The source is factual regardless.
-64
→Murder rate: This person is a columnist, not a journalist. He only referred to 3 states; remove claim that it applied to all states enacting CC.
+96
Reverted edits by JDano (talk) to last revision by 1990'sguy
m+446
→States with Constitutional Carry: space
m+1
please stop hounding/harassing me
-447
Undo revision 1361066 by JDano (talk) Once again, you AGAIN made the exact same edit you had been making numerous times. STOP. Go to talk. There is ZERO consensus to add/delete what you want.
+433
rm blog entry not directly related to subject; more concise; no ref to support claim that there are recent attempt to amend VT Constitution
-433
Oops, I botched the last edit badly. And, of course, I was so sure of myself that I didn't use "show preview".
+424
It might be nice if we had an article on the detailed meaning of this phrase, but we don't.
m-426
I see nothing wrong with this external link. Not *everything* associated with TAR is bad.
+346
The space is common sense.
m+1
Add back partially.
+115
STOP your anti-Breitbart edits. This is a clear habit you have, either removing or trying to legitimatize Breitbart. Stop. Will you label the Brady Campaign as opinion? http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&diff=1361013&oldid=1359328
-40
Appropriate link.
+19
Your wording added liberal bias that casts doubt on the CC movement. This description is neutral.
-17
Nothing wrong with this.
+57
Repeated links.
-35
"Ninja starts"? Really?
-13
moved a bit on the capitalization
-360
Undo revision 1361034 by JDano (talk) ....and in the process you add back TAR's link spam and bad capitalization. In addition, you continue with your anti-Breitbart bias.
+608
revert attempt to reintroduce TAR's link spam. This was a very badly written article because TAR could not write and believed that Idaho was the center of the universe.
-608
Undo revision 1361032 by JDano (talk) You also apparently have "strong" feelings because you constantly revert me without going to talk.
+608
further trim. If you have "strong" emotions about editing an article, please leave it to others.
-569
We can have both links. And please stop hiding your other changes that you make. Accept that other editors strongly disagree with you on them, and either accept it or go to talk.
+357
rewrite for clarity, wikify, rm spam link, better source.
-237
Don't need this.
-4
I will remove the Idaho part anyway. If this was the only part you really have a problem with, then we should have an agreement.
-1,228
Undo revision 1361023 by JDano (talk) I'm not following you around. I wish you would only change the portions you mentioned in your edit summaries.
+1,243
some changes were incorporated. Wordy, repetitive content was rewritten. Please stop following me around.
-1,243
Undo revision 1361020 by JDano (talk) And that justifies you deleting my entire edit, which is MUCH MORE than the Idaho part?
+1,243
the Idaho law is listed, the blow-by-blow steps in its adoption are no longer timely nor of current interest
-1,243
no edit summary
m+14
More fixes.
+19
This info is good. It should stay.
+1,520
clean TAR
-1,371