Page history
July 25, 2019
July 8, 2019
→Bible of faith tradition, family, community, denomination and church: minor revision of preceding edit
m-19
→Bible of faith tradition, family, community, denomination and church: paragraph spacing
m+4
→Bible of faith tradition, family, community, denomination and church: addn - and some of them promote the [http://www.newadvent.org/bible/gen001.htm Knox version] as "the most accurate 20th century translation of the scriptures"
+153
April 22, 2019
April 10, 2019
October 8, 2018
September 14, 2018
August 4, 2017
→Helpful Conservapedia resources: added Textus Receptus
+21
→Bible of faith tradition, family, community, denomination and church: link to http://www.kotipetripaavola.com/Biblemanuscripts.html The Bible manuscripts: attempts by modern scholarship to falsify the word of God
+124
March 24, 2017
November 19, 2016
August 28, 2016
August 12, 2015
January 19, 2015
→Parallel and interlinear editions: removed misleading "today"
-6
→The Reward: replaced link brackets [[ ]] with <span style="color:red">haec est autem...</span> per helpful instruction by AugustO
+135
→External links: Added link
+158
added External links section
+1,382
January 18, 2015
→Bible of faith tradition, family, community, denomination and church: removed unnecessary verbiage, moved some text re translations out of "Canon" to relevant section
m+376
→Bible of faith tradition, family, community, denomination and church
+973
→Discerning good and bad translations: Study Bibles: improved sentence
+158
added section "Parallel Bibles: English translations in parallel columns"
+2,495
→Authority to determine the canon: added to existing footnote boldface emphasis
m+10
→Authority to determine the canon: added link to footnote —Hall, Isaac. Defects of the King James Version, Isaac H. Hall, LL.B; Ph.D., ed.—bible-researcher.com
+258
January 16, 2015
→Authority to determine the canon: footnote needed clarification at its opening
m+38
→Bible of faith tradition, family, community, denomination and church: added factual statement "However, some of these are held to be faulty or defective translations." Article now fully complete.
+123
→Articles: added Historical-critical method (Higher criticism)
+51
→Critical editions: simply added Matthew 7:8 "every one who asks receives..."
+57
→Discerning good and bad translations: Study Bibles: provided links to online annotated Bibles Protestant and Catholic
+1,512
→Critical editions: bold-faced intro line to subsections, added a caveat re liberalist bias of some of the sources, acknowledging most are conservatives
+148
→Parallel and interlinear editions: provided online links to Parallel and Interlinear texts of Luke chapter 3 for comparison
+1,207
→The Reward: date of NABRE version
m+5
→Authority to determine the canon: removed odd dangling non sequitur Bible reference, prob accidental placement during previous extensive edit
m-20
established section headings for easier navigational access; added brief end section "The Reward", with comparative links
+1,852
→References
+22
moved How to choose a Bible to Essay: How to choose a Bible
mno edit summary
m-1
established new article, with links
+11,925