Page history

DavidB4-bot

→‎top: HTTP --> HTTPS #3, replaced: http://www.foxnews.com → https://www.foxnews.com

DavidB4-bot

→‎top: Spelling/Grammar Check & Cleanup

RJJensen

no edit summary

Ed Poor

Opponents maintain that proving intelligent causes or agents is not science but rather the study of theology and philosophy

Ed Poor

here's 1 thing they have in common

Ed Poor

fix closing ref tag

Ed Poor

linguistic confusion - is it deliberate? see liberal deceit

Ed Poor

why ID opponents equate ID with creationism

Ed Poor

distinct approaches to the origins question

Jinxmchue

Undo revision 524314 by Kaston31 (Talk)

Kaston31

no edit summary

ArnoldFriend

no edit summary

Ed Poor

The people who adamantly insist on teaching "intelligent design" in science classes are the young earth creationists, who will identify it with fundamentalist religion

Ed Poor

no more closely linked than Evolution and the Holocaust

Deborah

no edit summary

Ed Poor

philosophers who deny the possibility of supernatural causation are hostile to ID because it undermines one of atheism's primary arguments against the existence of God

Ed Poor

Atheists and believers both agree that if life has been designed, then this implies the existence of a Designer or Creator.

Ed Poor

firing a shot across the bow of NCSE - take that, you atheists!