Page history

MAdams

Conservapedia has a biased agenda. A biased agenda js not bad if it is ghe right kind of bias. A liberal agenda is bad. I switched the two terms to accurate represent the agenda of the subject.

DavidB4-bot

HTTP --> HTTPS, replaced: http://www.telegraph.co.uk → https://www.telegraph.co.uk (2)

DavidB4-bot

→‎External links: Category

DavidB4-bot

Spelling, grammar, and general fixes

DavidB4-bot

→‎External links: clean up

Ed Poor

best external link ever!

Ed Poor

I knew the Brits would come through eventually

Ed Poor

a damning quote from an insider - thank you, whistleblowers!

DerekE

cleanup and info added

Dadsnagem2

cat

Dadsnagem2

nobel

Ed Poor

biased - claims a consensus which does not exist

Ed Poor

to provide the science with which to support the negotiating process whose aim is to control greenhouse gas levels

Ed Poor

political group

Ed Poor

moved

Ed Poor

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) moved to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

DrSandstone

no edit summary

Ed Poor

ref

Ed Poor

revisions were made quietly after the acceptance of the report in order to "conform" it to the IPCC's (political) Summary for Policymakers

Ed Poor

reflist

Ed Poor

The misuse of the IPCC summaries, however, is not entirely accidental

Ed Poor

science has nothing to do with this body

DLerner

more info plus cat.

PhilipB

no edit summary

PhilipB

IPCC moved to The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

Jaques

no edit summary

RSchlafly

rm silly anti-IPCC diatribe

Czolgolz

no edit summary

Ed Poor

it must be objective when it comes to scientific matters - as objective as it is when it comes to human rights issues

Ed Poor

How they are utterly biased