Page history
September 26, 2018
July 29, 2016
July 13, 2016
September 2, 2011
April 22, 2010
no edit summary
m+1
no edit summary
m-105
"a view that was expressly intended to take God out of the picture of creation"
+488
December 24, 2008
August 18, 2008
Reverted edits by Nairolf (Talk); changed back to last version by Tolerance
m+3,446
Removing all content from page
-3,446
April 15, 2008
hedr
m+44
→Naturalistic evolution and Naturalistic evolution: fix
m-4
Naturalistic evolution and Naturalistic evolution
+205
Reference Form, links
+49
October 24, 2007
October 21, 2007
August 8, 2007
<references/>
m+25
new species of life came into being as a result of natural causes only, that is, without any supernatural intervention
msame as "unguided evolution"
+43
Naturalistic Evolution moved to Naturalistic evolution: lowercase for "name of a theory"
mUnguided evolution moved to Naturalistic Evolution
mFact is, over 80% of Americans reject it.
+1,163
claims that new species of life came into being as a result of natural causes
-17
August 7, 2007
no edit summary
+19
→Partisanship: Who says guidance should not be mentioned? And why?
+17
opposite of Creationism
+78
May 13, 2007
May 5, 2007
April 24, 2007
April 8, 2007
skepticism that life developed via purely unguided evolutionary processes remains very high
+121
Actually, "God" is specifically mentioned in these polls
-19
→Polls: The data is out there - try Google
+205
polls
+265
Use google instead of deletion when you don't know something
+75
usage and partisanship
+1,003
Would like to see a source (the poll?) for those numbers.
-84
This is the article that the liberals at Wikipedia voted to delete
+220