Page history
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk: Anagram
October 1, 2008
→Conservapedia anagrams: removed a few weaker ones
-99
→Conservapedia anagrams: new section
+823
→Standards: yes
+105
no edit summary
+212
→Standards: Agree
+104
typo
m-2
→Standards: new section
+747
September 30, 2008
reply to Taj
+537
slip of the tongue
-1
no edit summary
+142
no edit summary
+338
→in response: to me being tired and ticked off at the dumb things people do to sway Society
+260
no edit summary
+126
→in response: . Don't get me wrong.. I'm against him, but I feel it isn't right to push lies or point out fault to sway voters
m+196
Is an Obama anagram needed?
+141
→in response: to the Barack Obama anagram
m+495