Page history
Talk: Euler's Formula
August 18, 2015
August 17, 2015
Just two more thoughts
+1,331
→Just a thought: "it works ..." ''at what''? Using "i" as an exponent may have value to the extent that any orthogonal coordinates have value, but it could be "j" or "k" to accomplish the same goal.
+278
→Arbitrary definition for using the imaginary square root of -1: upps
→Arbitrary definition for using the imaginary square root of -1
+1,139
→Arbitrary definition for using the imaginary square root of -1: @Aschlafly
+1,072
→Arbitrary definition for using the imaginary square root of -1: I have to think about that further. Raising i to an exponential power seems to require an additional assumption.
+222
→Arbitrary definition for using the imaginary square root of -1
+528
restore now that the math bug is fixed
+146
revert test
m-146
test <math></math>
+146
August 16, 2015
→Arbitrary definition for using the imaginary square root of -1
+221
It's interesting that the comments above compared this with E=mc<sup>2</sup>, because in both cases it is simply a redefinition rather than a derivation.
+381
→Arbitrary definition for using the imaginary square root of -1: new section
+355