Page history
Talk: Iran-Contra affair
October 1, 2026
October 20, 2016
April 7, 2007
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: No shame is needed. Of course there is a greater burden of proof for assertions of criminal wrongdoing
+357
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
m-11
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+663
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: grammar
+5
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: Thanks for clarifying that
+366
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+772
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: I am mainly asking that accusations of criminal behavior be specific and documented
+150
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: What purpose does that serve
+280
April 6, 2007
no edit summary
+451
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: I am not posting any opinion
+406
no edit summary
+130
Talk:Iran-Contra Affair moved to Talk:Iran-Contra affair
m
April 4, 2007
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: two more comments
+395
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: Yes, indeed
+525
no edit summary
+353
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: Yes, the Reagan administration cooperated fully
+268
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+507
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: I don't see where the Walsh Report has anymore weight then the Starr Report has
+471
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+671
→Hurrah for revisionist history!: If you want to put in some facts about MacFarlane, go ahead
+234
→Hurrah for revisionist history!
+173
no edit summary
+51
no edit summary
+616
Pul-leeez
+833
no edit summary
+1,656
typo
yes, they can be removed
+616
Wikiinterpreter, sorry....
+570
no edit summary
+244
What details of laws being broken?
+205
Not surprising
-1
Not surprising
+454
no edit summary
+117
I took out some cocaine stuff
+257
need sources
+965