Page history
Talk: Scientific Revolution
June 5, 2008
→A few problems with the article: Did you read it properly?
+495
→A few problems with the article
-1
A few problems with the article
+1,351
February 6, 2008
May 24, 2007
May 11, 2007
May 10, 2007
→Denial
+603
→Denial
+498
→It's hardly a "modern" term...: Add copy of Google Books link here, too
m-1
→It's hardly a "modern" term...
+56
1867 quotation is from a book available online as a full-text image.
+169
→Denial: to RSchlafly
+1,193
→Denial
+1
→Denial
+8
→Denial: The "scientific revolution" is a big myth
+137
→Denial
+20
→Denial
+524
→Denial
+653
→Denial: Yes, there has been growth since the 1500s
+224
May 9, 2007
April 25, 2007
thanks...
+283
→It's hardly a "modern" term...: I now see the 1867 quote in the article
+301
No, I don't know who might be quoting me, if anyone
+283
→It's hardly a "modern" term...: Who used the term in the 1800s?
+90
It's hardly a "modern" term...
+132
so what resource can I turn to? Will and Ariel Durant are fairly well respected, I guess I can skip ahead a few volumes...
+359
Yes, your text is distorted
+153
still waiting for reply
+1,131
April 24, 2007
distortion?
+263
that is a good example of the myth described in the article
+321
reference?
+914
There is a long history of science before Galileo
+130
no edit summary
+440
Is there something wrong with the description in the first paragraph?
+34
PPS
+144
PS
+184
answer
+961
So the revolution was a rediscovery? What makes it a revolution?
+124
whaaat?
+204