Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 448: Line 448:     
:It's not surprising that there are some minor disputes about ''when'' the first use of a word occurred.  But the disputes are not substantial enough to alter the overall trend of doubling by century.  In fact, these changes may conform the data more closely to the geometric growth rate.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:19, 30 August 2012 (EDT)
 
:It's not surprising that there are some minor disputes about ''when'' the first use of a word occurred.  But the disputes are not substantial enough to alter the overall trend of doubling by century.  In fact, these changes may conform the data more closely to the geometric growth rate.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:19, 30 August 2012 (EDT)
 +
::Superb remark! In the meantime, I have had a closer look at the list. Most of the terms don't seem inherently conservative to me. For instance, do you really think ''illiteracy'' is a conservative word of the highest quality just because "liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the public schools are illiterate today"? With explanations like that, any word can be labeled conservative or liberal.
 +
::As to the geometric growth rate, have you considered that the ''total'' number of words in the English language shows a similar growth rate? [[User:Richman|Richman]] 11:40, 2 September 2012 (EDT)
    
== Understanding the theory ==
 
== Understanding the theory ==
33

edits

Navigation menu