Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 472:
Line 472: + +
Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words (view source)
Revision as of 00:36, August 31, 2012
, 00:36, August 31, 2012→Understanding the theory: today there is immense opportunity for upward mobility in America, which did not exist in 1600.
::--[[User:JohanZ|JohanZ]] 19:03, 30 August 2012 (EDT)
::--[[User:JohanZ|JohanZ]] 19:03, 30 August 2012 (EDT)
:::Perhaps society's conservatism was only "2" in 1600, and today it is "7". Perhaps a logarithmic scale (as with earthquakes) would be better than a linear scale. In 1600, the wealthiest person lacked a standard of living that many poor Americans enjoy today. Moreover, today there is immense opportunity for upward mobility in America, which did not exist in 1600.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:36, 30 August 2012 (EDT)