Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,135
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + + +
add quotes section with CCC on rash judgment, detraction, and calumny
;''Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.'', before Cal. Supreme Court
;''Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.'', before Cal. Supreme Court
:After SCOTUS's ''[[AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion]]'' decision holding state rules requiring class actions to be available as preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, the California Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's refusal to grant Valencia's motion to compel arbitration on the grounds that the contractual provision for an appeal in certain circumstances and the carve-out for relief Valencia would be likely to seek was substantively unconscionable. Valencia petitioned for certiorari, and the California Supreme Court granted it; the Supreme Court will determine whether the Court of Appeals' refusal to enforce the arbitration provision on the grounds of the one-sidedness of the appeals clause and the carve-out for relief likely to be sought by Valencia is also preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
:After SCOTUS's ''[[AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion]]'' decision holding state rules requiring class actions to be available as preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act, the California Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's refusal to grant Valencia's motion to compel arbitration on the grounds that the contractual provision for an appeal in certain circumstances and the carve-out for relief Valencia would be likely to seek was substantively unconscionable. Valencia petitioned for certiorari, and the California Supreme Court granted it; the Supreme Court will determine whether the Court of Appeals' refusal to enforce the arbitration provision on the grounds of the one-sidedness of the appeals clause and the carve-out for relief likely to be sought by Valencia is also preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
==Quotes==
{{cquote|''Respect for the reputation'' of persons forbids every attitude and word likely to cause them unjust injury. He becomes guilty:
:--of ''rash judgment'' who, even tactily, assumes as true, without sufficient foundation, the moral fault of a neighbor;
:--of ''detraction'' who, without objectively valid reason, discloses another's faults and failings to persons who did not know them;
:--of ''calumny'' who, by remarks contrary to the truth, harms the reputation of others and gives occasion for false judgments concerning them.|x|x|CCC 2477}}
==Unsorted links storyboard==
==Unsorted links storyboard==